The Cat in the Hat Turns and Runs for Cover
One of the books Aislinn picked out at the book fair today was “If I Ran the Rain Forest” by Bonnie Worth. The cover includes the cat and the kids from The Cat in the Hat. The back states that, “There is a big gap between ‘concept’ books written for preschoolers and nonfiction that requires fluent reading skills. The Cat in the Hat’s Learning Library books introduce beginning readers to important basic concepts about the natural world.”
Okay, I’ll buy that. I’ll agree that this is a worthwhile venture. But if you are going to appropriate the characters and style of a genius, you’d better be sure that you can rise to his level, or as close to his level as the average mortal could hope to climb. The writing has to be snappy and perfect. When someone reads it, she should not be thinking to herself, “You know, this idea would be clearer if it was phrased like this.” I have never held that thought during repeated, continuous, and incessant readings of many, many Dr. Seuss books. However, on the second page I found this:
“It is a rain forest.
The reason is clear.
About one hundred inches
of rain falls each year.”
One hundred inches falls? I’m no English major, but shouldn’t that be “fall”? Maybe this is a grammatical grey area. But if you are going to claim a kinship with Dr. Seuss, shouldn’t you try a little harder or at least postpone the questionable grammar until later in the book? Couldn’t this have been rewritten? I’ve been on my feet all day, holding long conversations with numerous children under 8, and still I managed to come up with this:
“A place where it rains
One hundred inches each year
is called a rain forest.
Let’s see what lives here.”
Isn’t that a little better? The next most annoying page?
“Find six hidden things
and you’ll win a prize.
The sure way to win
is to sharpen your eyes.”
As soon as we turned the page, both Lauren and Marty asked what the prize was. If you want parents to buy your books, you should never, I repeat not ever, refer to a nonexistent prize. Kiddies expect a prize on the next page, so why not put a picture of a blue ribbon? Better yet, why not ditch the prize reference?. And is “sharpen your eyes” something new that the kids are saying these days, because while I’ve been told to”keep a sharp eye” on something, I’ve never been asked to “sharpen my eyes.” How about this:
“Find six hidden creatures.
Be a detective!
You can see that their camouflage
is very effective.”
Camouflage is defined on the previous page, so why not use it again for reinforcement? Some of the phrasing is just awkward and confusing:
“This plant gives an insect
a most deadly ride.
It slips when it sips
and gets trapped inside.”*
As a chemistry major, I’m reluctant to make any sweeping grammatical judgments, but doesn’t â”It” in the third line technically refer to the “ride” since it is the most nearby noun? I know that I of all people should not be quibbling with other people’s pronoun matching, but I write all of this crap for free. I don’t charge people $8.99 for it, so I feel justified in expecting a little bit more from Ms. Worth. How about this:
“Some plants catch insects
that crawl in for a sip.
They can’t get away
once they’re in the plant’s grip.”
At one of my former jobs I was reviewing a colleague’s report that included a sentence something like “Trash has been deposited at the top of a steep incline where some of the debris tends to move down the slope due to the force of gravity” instead of “Some of the trash has fallen into the ditch.” The following page reminded me of that episode:
“This little bird helps
the flowers to grow
because pollen sticks
to its body, and so,
when the pollen gets brushed
from its feet and its head,
it causes the pollen
to scatter and spread.”
Again, does the pollen have feet and a head? I appreciate that this breathless sentence is Seusslike, but it is also stupidlike. How about this?
“A hummingbird has
a critical job.
As it eats it gets messy
But don’t call him a slob.
That mess is just pollen
that the small bird delivers
to other flowers and plants
as he flies, flits, and quivers.”
Another bad one:
“Who makes their home here?
Those who like heights best,
an eagle named harpy
here makes her nest.”
“Here makes her nest?” Another version I wrote in about 20 seconds after a glass of wine:
“What kind of animal
thinks this home is best?
The harpy eagle’s proud
to choose this spot for her nest.”
There’s a lot of information in this book, and theoretically, my kiddies could learn some things from it. But all of the writing seems convoluted and strained, and the kiddies definitely sense that something is not right. I’m not claiming that what I’ve done is any better (actually I am a little bit), I’m just trying to demonstrate that with a little more care, a professional could have made this book more engaging and enjoyable.
I have done some research into writing children’s books, and over and over again books emphasize that if you are going to write a rhyming book, the rhyme cannot seem forced. In fact, the books recommend that most authors abandon the notion of rhyming altogether. After reading this, I can understand why. Rhyming is hard, that’s why we have yet to meet the next Dr. Seuss. The pictures are pretty good, but they can’t overcome the writing. Random House, you can’t just slap a Cat in the Hat on any book. The marketing can’t trump the writing. Try a little harder.
*Quotes from If I Ran the Rain Forest by Bonnie Worth, 2003.

.jpg)






