All This Post Needs is a Mickey Mouse T-Shirt
This year I have had plenty of time to do a lot of reading and to acquaint myself with endless anti-woman conspiracy theories. Sometimes I can see some truth to them, sometimes I think they are a load of horse hockey. However, I think the most pernicious force against women and a pressing issue of the times can be described in two words: mom jeans. When I read this article in The Washington Post last month, I thought about writing about it but got distracted by all of my bulk religious inspirational/hate mail.
For those of you unclear on the whole mom jeans thing (and uninterested in reading that whole article) here is a brief description:
“The styling and cut is often generous, especially in the pants leg, waist and tummy. The fit is comfortable, which is important for active moms with on-the-go children. And finally, most of the jeans are often very reasonably priced and can be found at retailers like Wal-Mart, Target, Kohl’s and JC Penney. … But the problem is that mom jeans flatter almost no one. Though they were ostensibly designed to compliment a real woman’s fuller figure, the reality is that most of them make an average wearer’s behind, hips and stomach look…well, big.”
First, a confession. The final vestiges of mom jeans were only cleaned out of my wardrobe four years ago. I had ditched the super-high waist at some point in the 90s, but the “slightly” tapered leg held on in my closet until I was pregnant with Marty. In my defense, I am a product of the 80s which was the heyday of tapered leg pants. In fact, in a high school speech class, Danielle and Celeste (the cutting edge cool girls) gave a whole demonstration on how to turn a regular pair of jeans into a brightly dyed pair of “pegs,” and we all sat mesmerized. Over the years, the tapered leg jeans were always available, so it never occurred to me that they were a really bad idea.
Then I saw “What Not To Wear,” a show that may rank right up there with Ken Burns’ 9-part Civil War series in the amount of knowledge provided to me. Woman after woman showed up on that show with mom jeans, and woman after woman heard the message that by making your ankles the smallest part of you, you are making every other part above your ankles look wider, and by putting tiny little pockets high up on your rear end, you are making your rear end look like King Kong and your pockets like Jessica Lange. Woman after woman refused to believe the style gurus, but in the end, woman after woman left that show looking 15 pounds lighter and 3 inches taller by ditching the mom jeans and putting on good jeans.
So why are these universally unflattering jeans so widely available? Not just at Wal-Mart but at the Gap and Old Navy? Even Calvin Klein makes mom jeans. Why? Would the extra fabric required to untaper the leg really break the bank? If women could only find lower-waisted (and by this I do not mean low-waisted since I have to pick things up off the floor for 80% of my waking hours and am not interested in mooning the neighbors) straight-legged pants, they’d buy them and be happy. Why are flattering jeans so expensive and hard to find?
Another interesting quote from the article states that
“The mom jeans phenomenon, Guzman says, ‘encapsulates what happens to some women when they become parents. For many women, there’s also this idea that dressing in a way that’s obviously figure flattering or youthful is unbecoming to a mother. There’s something insidious in this culture that suggests this. That’s the thing that (author) Judith Warner captured in “Perfect Madness,” and that other writers are picking up on. There’s that message that if you’re not martyring yourself, and that extends to your physical appearance, then you’re not doing your job as a parent.’”
My sister and I have discussed this very point. We have both encountered a rather hostile group of power moms at our children’s schools. These moms run the PTO and all of the fundraisers, and they are always at the school volunteering for one thing or another. The power mom uniform is mom jeans or sweatpants and cartoon character t-shirts or huge sweatshirts. We have both gotten the impression that no matter how much we volunteer, we will never be accepted in the power mom crowd, because we’re out of uniform. (I wear sweatpants as often as I can at home, but somehow they doesn’t seem appropriate for working at the book fair or chaperoning a field trip.) If you don’t look like you’re “martyring yourself” and you are taking the time to put on clean clothes and blow dry your hair, clearly you are not as dedicated to helping the kids.
So who is behind this mom jean conspiracy? Rich women who can afford nice jeans and don’t want the masses to look as good as they do? Power moms who want to be able to look put-upon and differentiate themselves from the less devoted? Men who want their wives to look dowdy to keep away poachers? Verizon?
Since neither Stacy or Clinton from “What Not to Wear” has been assassinated, maybe the mom jean conspirators are not as powerful as I think. All of the high schoolers today wear boot cut jeans, so maybe some day the mom jeans will die out. But probably not until I die out, and that means (hopefully) another 40 years or more of jeans that say, as Saturday Night Live put it, “I’m not a woman anymore, I’m a mom.”
